Select Page

We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe
By Joel M. Moskowitz
Posted November 14, 2019

5G health effects being hideen by indsutryThe telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of “fear mongering” over the advent of wireless technology’s 5G. Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.

The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.

Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating. More…

The Facts:
This Scientific American article explains why 5G wireless technology may not be safe for human health. There are numerous other publications that show clear cause for concern, and the industry has not even conducted any safety testing.

Reflect On:
How are technologies like this, which have clear biological effects, allowed to rollout without any appropriate safety testing?